The Cost Principles (FAR Part 31) · FAR 31.201-2

Allowability of Costs — The Five Tests of FAR 31.201-2

Also known as: Determining allowability, FAR Part 31 cost principles, allowable cost

What you do here: Prove every cost you bill or price passes all five allowability conditions — and that you can show your work

At a Glance

Who it applies to
Any contractor whose price or payment is based on cost — cost-reimbursement, T&M/labor-hour, incentive, and any negotiated contract priced from cost data, plus most modifications and claims
What it obligates
Every billed or priced cost must satisfy five conditions simultaneously; failing any one makes the cost unallowable
Governing authority
FAR 31.201-2, within FAR Subpart 31.2 (Contracts With Commercial Organizations)
Burden of proof
On the contractor — FAR 31.201-2(d) requires records adequate to demonstrate the cost meets the criteria
The stakes
An unallowable cost is disallowed on the voucher, clawed back at rate settlement, and can carry a FAR 42.709 penalty

What It Is

FAR 31.201-2, Determining allowability, is the gate every dollar has to pass through before the government will pay it. It says a cost is allowable only if it satisfies five conditions at once: it must be reasonable (FAR 31.201-3); it must be allocable to the contract (FAR 31.201-4); it must comply with the Cost Accounting Standards if the contract is CAS-covered, and otherwise with generally accepted accounting principles and practices appropriate to the circumstances; it must be consistent with the terms of the contract; and it must not run into any limitation in FAR Subpart 31.2 — most importantly the 'selected costs' at FAR 31.205, which make dozens of specific categories expressly unallowable. All five are required. A cost can be perfectly reasonable in amount, properly allocated, and still be unallowable because FAR 31.205-14 says entertainment is unallowable, full stop. Two features of the rule catch contractors off guard. First, the burden is yours: FAR 31.201-2(d) says the contractor is responsible for accounting for costs appropriately and for maintaining records — including supporting documentation — adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, are allocable, and comply with the cost principles; if you can't support it, the contracting officer can disallow it, and you have no presumption in your favor. Second, 'unallowable' does not mean 'illegal' or 'you can't spend it.' It means the federal government won't reimburse it and you can't build it into a cost-based price. A firm can throw a holiday party; it just can't charge Uncle Sam for it. In plain terms: FAR Part 31 is the rulebook that decides which of your real, ordinary business expenses the government is willing to fund, and FAR 31.201-2 is its opening test.

When It Applies

  • On every cost-reimbursement contract, where you invoice actual costs and each one must clear the allowability test.
  • On time-and-materials and labor-hour contracts, for the materials and other direct costs billed at cost.
  • When you price a negotiated proposal from cost buildups — proposed costs must be allowable to be a legitimate basis for the price.
  • When you price a change order, a request for equitable adjustment, a termination settlement proposal, or a Contract Disputes Act claim.
  • When you build the indirect rates you bill against — unallowable costs must be stripped from the pools before the rate is computed.

Key Features

FeatureWhat It Means
Five conditions, all requiredReasonableness, allocability, CAS/GAAP compliance, consistency with contract terms, and no FAR Subpart 31.2 limitation. Failing any single one makes the cost unallowable.
The burden is on youFAR 31.201-2(d) puts the record-keeping and proof obligation on the contractor. No documentation, no reimbursement — the government does not have to disprove your cost.
'Unallowable' ≠ 'prohibited'You may still incur the cost as a business; you simply can't bill it to a federal contract or bury it in a cost-based price or an indirect rate.
It reaches indirect pools, not just direct chargesUnallowable costs sitting in an overhead or G&A pool inflate the rate you bill everyone at, which is why pools must be scrubbed before rates are computed.
It follows the contract into claims and terminationsThe same principles govern a request for equitable adjustment, a termination for convenience settlement proposal, and a CDA claim — not just routine vouchers.

The SDVOSB Angle

For an SDVOSB, allowability is where the transition from fixed-price to cost-type work either succeeds or quietly bleeds cash. On a firm-fixed-price job, the cost principles mostly matter for pricing; the moment you win a cost-reimbursement, T&M, or incentive contract, every dollar you bill is inspected against FAR Part 31 and the burden of proof is yours. Two habits protect a small firm. First, build the discipline before you need it: a chart of accounts with dedicated unallowable-cost accounts so entertainment, lobbying, alcohol, interest, and bad debts are segregated at the moment of entry rather than reconstructed during an audit two years later. Second, remember that unallowable costs in an indirect pool don't just hurt on one voucher — they inflate the overhead and G&A rates you bill on every federal contract, so a single sloppy pool becomes a systemic exposure at rate settlement. Small firms also under-appreciate the pricing side: unallowable costs are still real costs your business has to cover, so they belong in your profit target, not in your rate. Getting that right is exactly what separates a sustainable SDVOSB cost structure from one that wins awards and loses money.

How to Comply

  1. Set up dedicated unallowable-cost accounts in your general ledger so unallowable items are segregated when they are booked, not at audit time.
  2. Test every cost against all five FAR 31.201-2 conditions before it lands in a billing or a pricing buildup — not just against FAR 31.205.
  3. Keep the supporting documentation FAR 31.201-2(d) requires: invoices, receipts, timesheets, contracts, and the business purpose of the cost.
  4. Scrub unallowable costs out of your fringe, overhead, and G&A pools before you compute the rates you bill against.
  5. Read the contract itself — a clause, a negotiated agreement, or an advance agreement under FAR 31.109 can make a cost allowable or unallowable regardless of the general rule.
  6. When a cost is genuinely ambiguous, get an advance agreement with the contracting officer under FAR 31.109 rather than billing it and hoping.

Watch Out For

  • Assuming 'unallowable' means you can't spend the money — it only means the government won't reimburse it or let you price it in.
  • Treating FAR 31.205 as the whole test — a cost not mentioned in FAR 31.205 can still be unallowable for being unreasonable or unallocable.
  • Leaving unallowable costs in an indirect pool, which inflates the rate you bill on every contract and multiplies the exposure.
  • Forgetting FAR 31.201-6 directly associated costs — the travel and labor incurred solely to do an unallowable activity are themselves unallowable.
  • Relying on your commercial accountant's instincts; GAAP allows plenty of costs that FAR Part 31 expressly disallows.
  • Assuming a fixed-price contract makes the cost principles irrelevant — they still govern change-order pricing, REAs, claims, and terminations.

Run the Numbers

Price-to-Win Calculator

Frequently Asked

What makes a cost allowable on a federal contract?

Under FAR 31.201-2, a cost is allowable only if it satisfies five conditions at once: it is reasonable (FAR 31.201-3); it is allocable to the contract (FAR 31.201-4); it complies with the Cost Accounting Standards if the contract is CAS-covered, or otherwise with generally accepted accounting principles appropriate to the circumstances; it is consistent with the terms of the contract; and it is not limited by any cost principle in FAR Subpart 31.2, including the 'selected costs' at FAR 31.205. All five must be met — failing any one makes the cost unallowable. The contractor bears the burden under FAR 31.201-2(d) of maintaining records adequate to demonstrate that claimed costs meet these criteria.

Does 'unallowable' mean I'm not allowed to spend the money?

No. 'Unallowable' is a reimbursement concept, not a prohibition. A cost being unallowable under FAR Part 31 means the federal government will not reimburse it on a cost-type contract and you cannot include it in a cost-based price or in an indirect cost rate you bill against. You are free to incur the cost as a business — a company holiday party, a lobbying retainer, or interest on a loan are all legal business expenses. They simply have to be funded from your profit and your commercial revenue rather than charged to a federal contract.

Do the FAR cost principles apply to firm-fixed-price contracts?

Not to the routine invoicing — on a firm-fixed-price contract you bill the agreed price and the government does not examine your actual costs. But the cost principles still reach fixed-price work in several places: when you price the original proposal from a cost buildup, when you price a change order or option, when you submit a request for equitable adjustment or a Contract Disputes Act claim, and when a termination for convenience settlement proposal is priced from your incurred costs. In each of those situations the costs you put forward must be allowable under FAR Part 31.

Who has to prove a cost is allowable — the contractor or the government?

The contractor. FAR 31.201-2(d) makes the contractor responsible for accounting for costs appropriately and for maintaining records, including supporting documentation, adequate to demonstrate that costs claimed have been incurred, are allocable to the contract, and comply with the applicable cost principles. If you cannot produce that support, the contracting officer may disallow the cost. There is no presumption that a claimed cost is allowable, and FAR 31.201-3 specifically says no presumption of reasonableness attaches to a cost the contracting officer challenges.

Primary Sources

Plain-English reference, not legal, accounting, or tax advice. Cost allowability and accounting determinations are fact-specific, and the FAR, the Cost Accounting Standards, and the statutory dollar thresholds quoted here are amended and escalated for inflation over time. Always read the current FAR text and the cost and payment clauses in your specific contract, confirm the applicable thresholds and your accounting treatment with the contracting officer or cognizant administrative contracting officer, and consult a qualified government-contract accountant or counsel before relying on a cost position, signing a certificate, or submitting a claim.

Last updated Update cadence: Quarterly, plus on FAR amendment or inflation adjustment of the TINA / CAS / penalty thresholds
Change log (1)
  1. LaunchedPublished the federal cost principles, indirect rates & government accounting requirements reference covering how the government decides what an SDVOSB may charge it — the five allowability tests of FAR 31.201-2, reasonableness and allocability (FAR 31.201-3 / 31.201-4), the expressly unallowable costs of FAR 31.205 with directly associated costs (FAR 31.201-6) and the FAR 42.709 / 52.242-3 penalty, the direct-vs-indirect consistency rule (FAR 31.202 / 31.203), the fringe/overhead/G&A pool-and-base structure behind a wrap rate, provisional billing rates (FAR 42.704), the incurred cost submission and final indirect rate settlement (FAR 52.216-7(d) / 42.705 / 42.708 quick closeout), the adequate accounting system tested on the SF 1408 (FAR 16.301-3 / 9.106), timekeeping and labor charging with floor checks and total time accounting, DCAA audits versus DCMA administrative contracting officer determinations, certified cost or pricing data and defective pricing (FAR 15.403-1 / 15.403-4 / 15.406-2 / 52.215-10), and the Cost Accounting Standards with the small-business exemption at 48 CFR 9903.201-1 — each with an at-a-glance quick-facts card, a when-it-applies list, a key-features table, an SDVOSB-specific angle, a how-to-comply checklist, watch-outs, FAQPage, Article, Dataset, and BreadcrumbList structured data, primary-source FAR / U.S.C. / CFR citations, and cross-links into the glossary, contract types, payment methods, thresholds, clauses, forms (SF 1408), regulation explainers, contracting roles, how-to guides, FAQ, and the price-to-win, size-standard, win-probability, and limitations-on-subcontracting calculators.

Related Cost Rules

How It Plays by Contract Type

CPFFCost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF)
T&MTime-and-Materials (T&M)
FFPFirm-Fixed-Price (FFP)

How You Get Paid

VouchersCost-Reimbursement & T&M Vouchers

Dollar Thresholds That Matter

$2 millionCertified Cost or Pricing Data (TINA) Threshold

Clauses That Apply

FAR 52.212-4Contract Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Forms You’ll Use

SF 1408Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor — Accounting System

People You’ll Deal With

CO / KOContracting Officer

Terms Used on This Page

FARCost-Reimbursement ContractT&MDCAA

In the FAQ Knowledge Base

What cost accounting standards apply to SDVOSB government contracts?
What accounting system requirements apply to SDVOSB contracts?
What types of contracts do SDVOSBs typically perform?
← All Cost Principles, Indirect Rates & Government Accounting Requirements